.jpg?p=120209_04:29)
.jpg?p=120209_04:31)
.jpg?p=120209_04:54)
.jpg?p=120209_04:35)
.jpg?p=111221_03:51)
So Jaguar's in safe hands, then. This is the Tata Nano, the new super-affordable car from the company widely expected to buy Jaguar and Land Rover in the next few weeks.
Dubbed the 'lakh' car - from the colloquial Indian word for 1,000,000 rupees, which equates to about £1,250 - the Nano delivers on Ratan Tata's pledge to build an ultra-cheap car for the Indian market.
The world's cheapest, in fact - the Nano is being marketed as an alternative to the scooters and tuk-tuks that most Indians use to get around. Shorter than a Mitsubishi i but using a similar monoboxed, rear-engined layout, it's no exaggeration to say that the Nano could transform subcontinental motoring. Be afraid.
So what do you get for the price of a sofa? Not a lot, in honesty. The Nano is powered by a two-cylinder engine, which develops a mighty 32bhp. Driving the rear wheels, it'll see the Nano to 44mph in 14 seconds (why 44mph, we're not sure) and on to a top speed of around 66mph. It'll manage around 57mph, too.
Luxuries? Not many, as you might have guessed. Twelve-inch wheels come as standard along with, erm, a steering wheel, four seats and perhaps even some suspension. A radio is an optional extra.
Concerns have been voiced about the Nano's environmental impact and safety standards, but Tata claims that it has been 'built to meet safety requirements and emissions norms, to be fuel efficient and low on emissions'.
Mild obfuscation, perhaps, but Tata also says that the Nano's safety performance 'exceeds regulatory requirements'. Exactly what those requirements are remain unclear, but at least the Nano should be safer than a scooter. Or, say, hopping.
Tata is yet to announce whether the Nano will go on sale outside of India, but we reckon it could be just the entry-level Jaguar to attract young penniless reprobates to the brand. Perhaps not.
Open Car Bar
What do you think?
Want to comment on this?
Jaswalla commented on this article
at 05:38 pm on 22 March 2009
'Lakh' isn't the "colloquial Indian word" for 1,000,000 rupees. Lakh is derived from 'laakh', which in the numerical system in India refers to 100,000 and not 1,000,000.
Link to this comment
Report this comment
You are about to report a comment for breaking our Code of Conduct.
Please note, we will not remove a post just because you disagree with what is being said.
This form can only be used for reporting a comment. If you want to contact us please go to our contact us page.
stigjeremymay commented on this article
at 07:48 pm on 22 March 2009
At least Mr Brown and his darling should have had NANO thoughts like TATA's did and guess what the British economy wouldn't have been standing in such a obscure position "Only in Underpants getting drenched in rain in front of a speed cam trying to lit up a half burned joint".
Link to this comment
Report this comment
You are about to report a comment for breaking our Code of Conduct.
Please note, we will not remove a post just because you disagree with what is being said.
This form can only be used for reporting a comment. If you want to contact us please go to our contact us page.
mediaman1 commented on this article
at 03:33 pm on 09 April 2010
Why 44mph? Because its 70kph, ever heard of the metric system? What total c*ck wrote this article? Do us all a favour and quit, will ya?
Link to this comment
Report this comment
You are about to report a comment for breaking our Code of Conduct.
Please note, we will not remove a post just because you disagree with what is being said.
This form can only be used for reporting a comment. If you want to contact us please go to our contact us page.
rishisoman commented on this article
at 07:29 pm on 04 May 2010
who da hell wrote this, it passed da eu standards, n he's askin which requirements, but it does look like Pikachu like Clarkson said!!
Link to this comment
Report this comment
You are about to report a comment for breaking our Code of Conduct.
Please note, we will not remove a post just because you disagree with what is being said.
This form can only be used for reporting a comment. If you want to contact us please go to our contact us page.
Soham.natu commented on this article
at 11:11 am on 27 August 2010
I though this was BBC? What happened, forgot to proof read? Lakh is not 1,000,000, Its just 100 000! I can also understand why it must be so difficult to understand how some one who makes jaguars and landrovers can make a nano, well there are quiet a few companies and countries trying to figure it out!! Also its the EU "European Union" emission norms that this car passed!! Seriously whos the author of this article? or let me guess it was outsourced, to phillipines!!
Link to this comment
Report this comment
You are about to report a comment for breaking our Code of Conduct.
Please note, we will not remove a post just because you disagree with what is being said.
This form can only be used for reporting a comment. If you want to contact us please go to our contact us page.