Saab is dead

GM decides to kill of Saab after no buyer is found for the company

18 December 2009

Back to Car News

Saab

GM has announced it is killing Saab. The historic Swedish car maker has been up for sale for most of 2009, and no buyer has stepped up. GM is enormously vulnerable financially, having just come out of bankruptcy. It can’t afford to prop up the loss-making Saab any longer.

Saab isn’t going down in flames: the wind-up, says GM, will be ‘orderly’. In other words, Vauxhall dealers will honour warranties, and Saab workers and suppliers will get paid.

But 3400 Saab people will lose their jobs, and there are 1100 Saab dealerships around the world which will also mean job losses there.

When Saab was first put up for sale, tiny Swedish supercar maker Koenigsegg made up a financial consortium to buy the company. But at the last minute it pulled out.

Then tiny Dutch supercar company Spyker did the same (see a pattern here?). But it has been unable to overcome ‘due diligence issues’. Hmmmm: Spyker has never made real money. And it wasn’t a success at F1. Nor at Le Mans. To buy Saab looked like wildly over-reaching itself, frankly.

Meanwhile the Chinese firm BAIC has bought the rights to make the old Saab 9-5 in China, plus certain technologies from the 9-3. But it doesn’t have the Saab name.

Saab is a proud carmaker. Its history is of safe, practical big cars with muscly turbo engines. They were interesting and eccentric and occasionally rather good. But when GM bought Saab to try and have a premium brand (similar to Ford buying Jaguar), GM didn’t really know what to do with it. It lost money continuously.

GM has been trying to simplify itself in the past year. It nearly sold Opel-Vauxhall (which would have meant a catastrophic loss of engineering expertise). It closed down Saturn and Pontiac. It sold Hummer to another Chinese company. And now Saab is toast.

What’s ironic is that Saab had some good new GM-based cars coming: the attractive new 9-5 was about to go into production and towards the end of the year a new 9-4X crossover was due to be launched, based on the impressive new Cadillac SRX. Now they’ll never see the light of day. Unless some other car maker wants to buy the rights on them. GM says it’s open to offers, but that seems unlikely.

Paul Horrell

Related

Category:
Car News
Tags:
Saab
GM
Koenigsegg
Top moments of TG telly
17 top moments of TG telly
Our most-watched clips
Hammond’s icons
BMW M3 (E30)
BMW M3 (E30)
First drives
Caterham Super 7 Supersport
Caterham 7 Supersport
Merc C63 Black vs M3 GTS
Merc C63 Black vs M3 GTS
In this month’s TG mag

What do you think?

Want to comment on this?

Can't say I didn't see this coming...

Report this comment

You are about to report a comment for breaking our Code of Conduct.

Please note, we will not remove a post just because you disagree with what is being said.

This form can only be used for reporting a comment. If you want to contact us please go to our contact us page.

I want to report this comment for:

Surely GM must have other assets that are losing them more money than Saab is. Then again, I guess they've survived this long ploughing millions of dollars into muscle car development so that a few thousand people can buy them makes sense in somebody's world.

Report this comment

You are about to report a comment for breaking our Code of Conduct.

Please note, we will not remove a post just because you disagree with what is being said.

This form can only be used for reporting a comment. If you want to contact us please go to our contact us page.

I want to report this comment for:

As i said before,Saab-Scannia does not deserve this.One of the best turbo engine makers of the world can not be closed down,now that it has this new models coming out and the "bio-ethanol" running engines already on the roads...well, i can`t do nothing about it but what about the swedish gov? and do you know what is gonna happen with aircraft?

Report this comment

You are about to report a comment for breaking our Code of Conduct.

Please note, we will not remove a post just because you disagree with what is being said.

This form can only be used for reporting a comment. If you want to contact us please go to our contact us page.

I want to report this comment for:

Saab is dead. Good.

Report this comment

You are about to report a comment for breaking our Code of Conduct.

Please note, we will not remove a post just because you disagree with what is being said.

This form can only be used for reporting a comment. If you want to contact us please go to our contact us page.

I want to report this comment for:

It was vaguely inevitable but it will be sad to see SAAB go. They have, after all, produced some decent cars over the years, maybe not "great" but decent all the same; 93 Turbo, 99 Turbo 900 Turbo, 9000 Turbo, all Turbo powered, but Turbocharging saloons seemed to be SAAB's trademark. Then there was the 9-3 Viggen, oh no wait, that car deserves the "worst understeering car ever" award, still it's infamous right?

Report this comment

You are about to report a comment for breaking our Code of Conduct.

Please note, we will not remove a post just because you disagree with what is being said.

This form can only be used for reporting a comment. If you want to contact us please go to our contact us page.

I want to report this comment for:

To post a comment: | Register