driven-hard-dodge-challenger-feature

Driven Hard: Dodge Challenger

By Michael Harvey
Dec 30 `08|29 Comments

I fell in love with America this year. Deeply, spiritually, irrevocably; my world will never be the same. It has been a long time coming. Believe me, this is no quick crush.

Barely two months have passed in the last 20 years — since my closest friend left "on a short business assignment" to New York and never returned — when I haven't bothered the immigration line at JFK. Yet I never quite let myself fall. I developed a repertoire of poorly disguised excuses to hide my growing dependence on New York's overwhelming, addictive energy. It's easy, after all, when you're a Brit to take the high ground; reject the city's soul, and all you'll see is gross vanity and self-interest. "That's not how we do it back in the Old World, old chap."

B.S.! Spend some time working there, as I have this year, and you'll see something else; a sense of community, a sense of ease, a sense of balance, a real intolerance with a lack of respect or poor support or contracted service, and a real belief in the sense of opportunity — the events of Nov. 4 validated that. My defense was stripped from me. It was apparent to anyone and everyone just how much the place meant to me. So I gave in. I fell in love with America. Inevitably, I fell in love with an American girl, too. It didn't work out.

Some months after that personal implosion, I'm pondering all this in a new Dodge Challenger, driving the same roads I used to take to see the girl. The irony isn't lost on me. This car is the only news Chrysler has left to shout about. Walt's once pioneeringly smart operation is in tatters of unpayable debt and unmeetable obligation. Daimler-Benz wasn't the answer, unskilled private equity certainly wasn't, now all it has to look forward to are government handouts and a shotgun marriage to General Motors. "Last chance power drive," indeed; I have a call before I leave the city. "Can we meet?" she asks.

The Challenger makes you think about how you feel regarding all things American. It's impossible to get under its skin if you don't. If you don't let America near your soul, then you'll never get it. It's a re-creation muscle car. No more, no less. A re-creation of the some of the most primitively engineered performance cars ever to hit road or track. Performance car? The original Challenger predated the Miura by three years, don't forget. So the new Challenger is doubly ersatz.

You, me, us...we should hate it. But we don't. I'd bet you love it, too.

I've written before (about another Dodge actually, the Viper) that I believe the only way to get on with American cars is to lower your expectations before you even climb in. (I actually wrote, "All American cars are shit," but I was younger then.) The Challenger is no exception. It turns up on the morning Top Gear's Cars of the Year shoot relocates from New York City to Montauk, 120 miles away on that long, all-too-familiar drive along the Long Island Expressway and Montauk Highway.

It creates a monumental stir outside the hotel in New York's hip Lower East Side. Don't forget these bellboys have already taken delivery of our Lamborghini and our Rolls-Royce. They're impressed. Truly impressed. And it goes on, the Challenger stopping traffic and breaking necks. Genuinely, I have never seen anything like it. And this is the LES, where New York's famous cool is at its most potent and potentially most poisonous. People try very hard around here not to be impressed by anything. When they are, it says something about that something. No amount of fake ram vents or fake carbon Fablon can hide the fact that the Challenger is a deeply beautiful object, possessed of a surface and silhouette that would grace any car. That it so viscerally evokes the original compounds the magic. It's magnificent.

Inevitably, then, by the time I throw my bags in the silly little trunk, expectations are high. I'm heading for a fall. As an American car, the Challenger delivers. The interior (we'll come to that, but it's not as bad as everyone says) is not the issue. It's the pedals, which feel remote, lazy and way too long in their action. The clutch, especially, seems to function only in 20 percent of its travel, so while the six-speed stick (yup, a yank with a proper gearbox — the original R/T had a three-speed manual, don't forget) is explicit enough, getting the Challenger under way ain't as dignified as it should be.

Trying to find a way around road work sees us getting lost. It's an LES thing; you can see the Williamsburg Bridge you're heading for, you just can't seem to get the combination of streets you want to get to it. We thread through Chinatown on our way back on track, and it's here, as if it wasn't apparent outside the hotel, that the Challenger shows its second flaw, its size. It's over 16 feet long. It's enormous. The goodwill generated by that dramatic arrival a few minutes earlier is starting to fade. It doesn't feel tight, it doesn't feel powerful, it's certainly not lean. And it ain't feeling especially fast.

But what was I expecting? Had my summer romance with America completely blinded me from that more youthfully expressed maxim on American automobilia? Who was I kidding, this is a modern car, a cheeky, pragmatic, maybe even cynical, way of getting us to buy the same old shit all over.

All cars are built around the vital organs of others these days, but, please, no snobbery here around the fact the Challenger is a Chrysler 300C under that two-door skin. And as American platforms go, the 300C ain't a bad one — Chrysler's recent history means there's a whole lot of stuff Mercedes left lying around the house when it exited under this car...independent suspension on all four corners, for instance. You don't find that on a Mustang or a new Camaro or a Corvette, even.

But even Stuttgart's finest chattels can't cope with the holes and ditches New York's road-keeping authorities believe it's still acceptable to inflict on the city. No wonder nobody drives in Manhattan. It's time to head out.

The magnificence of the three bridges — Brooklyn, Manhattan and Williamsburg — that span the lower end of the East River and feed traffic out in to Brooklyn and Queens bestow the beginning of the long haul to Long Island with a sense of romance the rest of the journey doesn't really justify, well not until the commuter suburbs and – some considerable 65-mph interstate miles later – the chichi residences of the Hamptons have been past. It's Dullsville for 100 of its 120 miles.

It's not until the arrow-straight I-27 is a distant memory that the Montauk Highway begins to play the Challenger's game. The clue's in the name: it's a muscle car, stupid. The muscle here is another Chrysler reinvention: the Hemi. In this case, a 6.1-liter producing 425 hp (the original R/T's 6.3-liter V8 had 335 hp). You wouldn't think it, so lazily is it produced, but it is, as is a more-than-welcome 420 lb-ft of torque. It's muscle that rapidly finds room under your skin. Away from stop-go traffic, on the free and empty streets challenger R/T's were made to race on, it begins to let you know it means business. Pussy around with this car and you'll wonder how a car that looks so much made-for-purpose can deliver so little; muscle it, and it'll begin to show you its soul.

By the time we arrive in Montauk at sunset, I've got the measure of this car. Big throttle, quick shifts, no messing with the god-awful clutch get this car growling and, you know what, really shifting. Close to five seconds to 60 mph, all the way to the ton and back to standstill in 17 seconds — just about quick enough to run off a quarter-mile drag race and park up without the State Troopers spotting you.

You sense yourself falling for it every time a junction needs clearing, or slow-moving traffic needs passing, or a green light needs racing. Bit by bit, that way it first made you feel returns to you. The interior ain't a stitch on the outside, but we all know interiors are so much more expensive than exteriors to execute, so I'm inclined to forgive. It's clean and clear and not so cheap looking. Besides, the radio's strong and clear and tuned to E Street radio, wall-to-wall Bruce Springsteen, which is where all this American thing began with me. Cars are a constant metaphor in Springsteen's writing, offering always the promise of an escape to somewhere better, the promise of the American dream. The Boss' critics decry this: "some things mean more, much more than cars and girls," they say. I'm not so sure.

So what about the girl? A well-traveled soul with an acute eye for all things pretty (your author clearly an exception), she never once flipped out over any of the cars I'd rock up at her door with throughout a long summer. Difficult to impress, then. But she likes the Challenger when I rock up the next morning. "It's cool," she says. It is, indeed.

Report a Problem


29 COMMENTS
Sort
Gearhead101's Avatar
on May 19 `09

The rivival of the old muscle cars to me is great and I have to say I love this car it may not be the best preforming of all of the ones coming out but its about the passion of the car not about its stats. I am worried about this car and other cars similar to it with the finacial troubles in the auto industry. The big three tend to go cheap when things get tight.

McBRIT's Avatar
By McBRIT
on Mar 11 `09

Too little , too crude , too cheap , TOO late , R.I.P Dodge

qwertyburn's Avatar
on Jan 25 `09

I prefer the GT-R or Mitsubishi evo.

Stang Guy's Avatar
on Jan 20 `09

The new R/T, to me, is just like the original Dodge Challenger, but with modern touches. And honestly, someone would have to be mad to buy a Camaro over one of these hot machines. In my case, nothing beats the tried and true Ford Mustang, but one of these pulls a close second!

SBC427's Avatar
By SBC427
on Jan 15 `09

The Corvette has had an IRS since 1963.

The new Camaro also has a fully independent suspension.  It is based on the Global Rear-Wheel Drive Platform (Formerly Zeta) that you blokes knew as the Monaro.  The only difference is that the Camaro will have the next evolution of that suspension.

I drove it in an ‘06 GTO, and found it to be exceptionally poised and very flickable for its weight.  I would have one in a heartbeat.

RadialSkid's Avatar
on Jan 15 `09

Boraxo:

It’s been well-known that most musclecars’ gross figures were UNDERRATED due to insurance surcharges during that time regarding horsepower. Many times, the original gross rating is an accurate reflection of the modern net rating.

The NHRA has been compiling a database of accurate factory-stock horsepower ratings for classification in their Stock Eliminator class for half a century now. http://www.nhra.com/tech_specs/classification/index.html .

Blocker6's Avatar
on Jan 13 `09

they took the new Challenger SRT out to El Marage(sic) in Cal. right off the showroom floor,gave it to Gary Selzei,and it ran 175 mph right out of the box…

Boraxo's Avatar
By Boraxo
on Jan 13 `09

The R/T at 375 hp starting at $30K is the only one that might be worth it, not the SRT (50 hp for an extra $10K? no thanks). The original Challenger’s 335 hp was measured back then as gross horsepower (at the crank), today’s ratings are net horsepower, so knock about 30% off the rating of any car before 1974 to compare to modern engines.

cepsespa's Avatar
on Jan 06 `09

Chrysler is pulling the wool over everyone’s eyes! I checked one of these out from top to bottom (LITERALLY) and it is so cheaply put together, that I’d rather have an original 1972 Challenger! $46,000 for a New Dodge? This is a re-birth that should have been aborted! I’ll take a used Ferrari 348 ANY DAY!

pahammer's Avatar
on Jan 06 `09

Without a Focus, Chrysler is doomed.

Jed118's Avatar
By Jed118
on Jan 05 `09

Yes… this is exactly what America needs.

Staggering that a dying manufacturer can produce something like this instead of something that will save them.

Mitsubishi will not save them this time.

damionstayton's Avatar
on Jan 05 `09

Look all in all it is a awesome car.It has been a long time coming and to be honest we needed it in America.So if you don’t like it find something else to look at….

Pennsylvania's Avatar
on Jan 04 `09

any questions watch ‘Vanishing Point’ its pretty much an american car that makes you feel good.

ccx806's Avatar
By ccx806
on Jan 04 `09

Why would anyone buy this over the new Chevrolet Camaro? The Camaro has more refinemnet, better handling, the same retro styling, and costs considerably less (The V8 Camaro SS will cost about $31,000 while the Challenger SRT8 costs about $41,000)

ske's Avatar
By ske
on Jan 04 `09

awesome car

whatapissr's Avatar
on Jan 04 `09

I agree with DJRUSA. All this overt pro-American banter seems awfully forced and artificial coming from the infamously snobby Brits. I like the kind words, but I can’t help but see their two faces.

niamh's Avatar
By niamh
on Jan 04 `09

although I do agree with most of the Challengers “flaws”, I love this car, and if you are a fan of muscle cars, you will be too. it is truly a testament to what American should be and how they used to be.

best car out of America since the ‘60s or early ‘70s

DJRUSA's Avatar
By DJRUSA
on Jan 02 `09

I enjoyed the article but boy am I surprised. Is this the same Mr. Harvey who wrote “land of the free my arse”?  In TG the magazine the “Faces” seem to take turns writing variations on the same article (writer goes to U.S., something bad happens, writes people are fat and stupid, and cars stink etc.) . The cynic in me wonders if the TG folks figured if they tone down the anti-US comments they could make some money. If Kittman writes nice about U.S. then I will know something is up

money bag$'s Avatar
on Dec 31 `08

HEY!!! DON’T SAY THAT ABOUT DODGE ‘CUZ I HANE A CHARGER R/T!!!!!

longdx's Avatar
By longdx
on Dec 31 `08

The problem lies in that the Challenger is ill suited for today’s market.  Yes, the Challenger seems well executed, but really does Chrysler really need this….now. Chrysler needs to focus on the core model line. That is the boring sedans that Honda/Toyota/Nissan make well, very well. To divert this much engineering/marketing to a decidely niche market is exactly why Chrysler’s current course is heading to oblivion.

cjymiller's Avatar
on Dec 31 `08

I woke up this morning in my girlfriend’s house and didnt know where I was for ten seconds. Then I realized I was in my girlfriend’s house.

kons4700's Avatar
on Dec 30 `08

it is a really cool car but i expected much more from it.it needs to be more sporty and competitive with the import coupes

cborozan's Avatar
on Dec 30 `08

wait…

... damn that is the SRT8 you guys tested the 2009 not the 2008!!!

cborozan's Avatar
on Dec 30 `08

This may be my favorite car because it is simple and fast, not supercar fast but it is quite quick and it does the Interstate runs so well, since that is all that I do it would be perfect if I could afford it :(

Btw great choice testing the R/T vs. the SRT8 the R/T is a better car!

warrenismad's Avatar
on Dec 30 `08

Why do the limies always wax pathetic about ‘the industry’ when they literally have no major auto manufactures of their own?...I was really ticked about the Katrina a go go episode…and nothing is worse than the BBC-If I wanted a 5 year old car-Heeeeeres yer show. Someone explain to Jeremy and the BBC what ‘time sensative’ means. This and DR Who are driving us nuts with reruns-WHERES TORCHWOOD ALREADY?

Bloke718's Avatar
on Dec 30 `08

Beautifully written. The feelings shine through.

dirtfreak250r's Avatar
on Dec 30 `08

as much as I love American cars I can’t help thinking that dodge could do so much better, especially when their asking for taxpayer money.

The American's Avatar
on Dec 30 `08

The Challenger is a classical execution of muscle, much like Marilyn Monroe is a classical execution of provocative sensual energy. I’m much more of a Lucy Liu fan, but I can appreciate Marilyn’s charm.

Psymon's Avatar
By Psymon
on Dec 30 `08

Another car that looks so good the performance can’t quite live up to it’s styling…

You must register or login to comment.
Login
Username:
Password:
Auto-login on future visits
Show my name in the online users list
Forgot your password?