# data.attributes.title
Why the Toyota Supra and BMW Z4 look so different

# data.attributes.metatag[].attributes.content
Why the Toyota Supra and BMW Z4 look so different | Top Gear

# data.attributes.metatag[].attributes.content
As the Supra lands, BMW's design boss explains how the Z4 differs

# data.attributes.metatag[].attributes.content
Why the Toyota Supra and BMW Z4 look so different

# data.attributes.metatag[].attributes.content
As the Supra lands, BMW's design boss explains how the Z4 differs

# data.attributes.metatag[].attributes.content
As the Supra lands, BMW's design boss explains how the Z4 differs

# data.attributes.metatag[].attributes.content
Why the Toyota Supra and BMW Z4 look so different

# data.attributes.metatag[].attributes.content
Why the Toyota Supra and BMW Z4 look so different

# data.attributes.metatag[].attributes.content
Why the Toyota Supra and BMW Z4 look so different

# data.attributes.metatag[].attributes.content
As the Supra lands, BMW's design boss explains how the Z4 differs

# data.attributes.body.value
It’s no secret that the new BMW Z4 and Toyota Supra share their platforms and mechanical bits. Even before we’ve seen the Supra shorn of disguise, though, it’s very clear they’re going to be very different looking cars. BMW design boss Adrian Van Hooydonk told Top Gear at last December's LA Auto Show that the two cars were designed almost entirely separately.

“It was a very, very easy collaboration in terms of design,” Hooydonk told us. “First of all, Toyota came to us because they respect BMW’s work in terms of dynamics and sporty cars. Akio Toyoda himself loves driving and when he first visited us he brought a crash helmet as he wanted to take our product out on the test track. Which he did!

“Then I met the design chief of Toyota. He’s Japanese and I’m Dutch, but we immediately understood each other in terms of what we want from our engineers, and in proportions. That was one conversation, that’s all it took. We immediately agreed on the hard points and what we want in terms of proportions. And they were also what the engineers needed in terms of performance.

“The design teams then went their separate ways and I never saw what they did until we were finished. We had a meeting at the end where we shared with one another what we’d done, on the same wheelbase and mechanicals.”

He acknowledges it’s easy to spot the car’s visuals were designed separately. “They look very different. Our design languages are still intact; we didn’t have to make a compromise and neither did they. We each have a strong idea about how we want to develop our brand, and Toyota’s is different from BMW’s. The cars fulfil slightly different roles for each of us.”

Hooydonk is also as delighted as we are that the Z4 has returned to a lighter, less complex soft-top roof. “I like a soft top better,” he says. “It’s actually a technology that’s good enough to drive all year round, so I don’t see a disadvantage.

“We have a bit more trunk space so it’s slightly easier to work with than a retractable hard-top, and once it’s closed you don’t have these shut-lines from all the different parts. As a designer, shut-lines are something you want to see as little of as possible.”

# data.attributes.body.processed
It’s no secret that the new BMW Z4 and Toyota Supra share their platforms and mechanical bits. Even before we’ve seen the Supra shorn of disguise, though, it’s very clear they’re going to be very different looking cars. BMW design boss Adrian Van Hooydonk told Top Gear at last December's LA Auto Show that the two cars were designed almost entirely separately.

“It was a very, very easy collaboration in terms of design,” Hooydonk told us. “First of all, Toyota came to us because they respect BMW’s work in terms of dynamics and sporty cars. Akio Toyoda himself loves driving and when he first visited us he brought a crash helmet as he wanted to take our product out on the test track. Which he did!

“Then I met the design chief of Toyota. He’s Japanese and I’m Dutch, but we immediately understood each other in terms of what we want from our engineers, and in proportions. That was one conversation, that’s all it took. We immediately agreed on the hard points and what we want in terms of proportions. And they were also what the engineers needed in terms of performance.

“The design teams then went their separate ways and I never saw what they did until we were finished. We had a meeting at the end where we shared with one another what we’d done, on the same wheelbase and mechanicals.”

He acknowledges it’s easy to spot the car’s visuals were designed separately. “They look very different. Our design languages are still intact; we didn’t have to make a compromise and neither did they. We each have a strong idea about how we want to develop our brand, and Toyota’s is different from BMW’s. The cars fulfil slightly different roles for each of us.”

Hooydonk is also as delighted as we are that the Z4 has returned to a lighter, less complex soft-top roof. “I like a soft top better,” he says. “It’s actually a technology that’s good enough to drive all year round, so I don’t see a disadvantage.

“We have a bit more trunk space so it’s slightly easier to work with than a retractable hard-top, and once it’s closed you don’t have these shut-lines from all the different parts. As a designer, shut-lines are something you want to see as little of as possible.”

# data.attributes.field_standfirst
As the Supra lands, BMW's design boss explains how the Z4 differs