You are here

Renault Twingo

Overall verdict


Renault's been brave with the new Twingo and the results have paid off


The only engine to go for is the dearer one
As entertaining and satisfying as the old Twingo was mundane and mediocre.

Find new & used cars

Our choice


0.9 TCE Dynamique 5dr [Start Stop]


What we say: 

Renault has tried something different with the Twingo, and it's worked

What is it?

The third generation of Renault’s city car, and every bit as radical now as the first was when it arrived in 1993. Architecture shared with the new Smart ForTwo and ForFour has helped both Renault and Mercedes justify the costs of development and allowed them to be a bit braver with the underpinnings. So here we have a rear-engined hatchback that drives the rear wheels, giving packaging and refinement benefits. 

The current engine line-up is limited to either a turbocharged 0.9-litre or a naturally aspirated 1.0, and we understand Renaultsport will be getting involved at some stage, too. Excellent.


It doesn’t matter that you’re not a keen driver and will only be popping to get your hair done – you need the turbo engine. The 0.9-litre TCe adds a welcome dose of charisma to the Twingo that the flatter 1.0-litre SCe fails to do – it just makes the whole car feel more lively and enthusiastic. In this instance, bigger does not mean better.

However, don’t go expecting a mini Porsche 911 experience. Most of the time you’d be hard pushed to tell the engine was in the back, which, we’re sure, is exactly what Renault intended. But the benefits of the engine’s position (you leave the noise behind you, tight turning circle, etc) shouldn’t be underestimated and, on the whole, it drives gamely. OK, it’s lacking real Panda-esque pizzazz, but it’s got more charm than an Up (and siblings) and more life in it than the 108/C1/Aygo triplets. 

On the inside

Notice the way the wheels of the Twingo are forced right to the corners? That’s good for interior space – and the engine’s position doesn’t reduce boot space too much – although we’d refrain from putting melty stuff on the boot floor.

The driving layout is good but watch the optioning. Renault has two phone-link systems, R&Go and R-Link, and neither works brilliantly. But otherwise there aren’t too many holes – visibility is great, it’s comfortable, quiet and smooth to operate. Quality’s a bit tinny, but hey, this is a city car, and only the Up manages to buck that trend. 


Unless you’re on a very tight budget, of the four trim levels and two engines, you want the top-line 0.9 TCe Dynamique. The £700 extra for the turbo engine is well worth it and, although the figures say the 1.0 with stop-start will be 1.6mpg more efficient, in the real world we bet the 0.9’s chunkier low down torque will make it the more efficient choice. Besides, base 1.0-litre cars don’t get stop-start and lose free road tax status. Whatever engine you choose though, this really won’t be a costly car to run.

Highlights from the range

Title 0–62 CO2 MPG BHP Price
The fastest
0.9 TCE Dynamique 5dr Auto
10.8s 108g/km 58.9 90 £12,900
The cheapest
1.0 SCE Expression 5dr
14.5s 112g/km 56.5 70 £9,490
The greenest
1.0 SCE Dynamique 5dr [Start Stop]
14.5s 95g/km 67.3 70 £11,300


How about something completely different?



Porsche 911

You really must have a rear-engined, rear-wheel drive machine? Then there's only one thing for it - you need a Porsche 911