The old Ford SYNus concept: a bank vault on wheels
Want to really take a break from the outside world? How about an armoured van?
What is it?
At first glance, it looks like an armoured van. At second glance, it still looks like an armoured van. Even at a very long, quite searching third glance, it still really does give the impression of being an armoured van.
And that’s because, apart from looking like it carries cash and armed security guards (perhaps even one that’s just two days from retirement), this is actually an armoured van – just one designed for personal use.
It’s called the Ford SYNus, which gives two impressions. One: someone held the shift key too long while typing, and two: maybe they were also on sinus medication or something. It's a stretch to expect anyone to read ‘SYNus’ and immediately think ‘Ah, yes, that’s clearly pronounced ‘sinuous’’. The irony being of course, this is the least sinuous car of all time.
Advertisement - Page continues belowWhat did it predict about the future?
The raison d'etre of the bank-vaultish Ford was to keep the people inside the SYNus safe and bullet-hole free, regardless of the intentions of whomever it was that was outside the SYNus, and however intent they were on creating said bullet holes. There were retractable shutters that slid over the already bulletproof glass, the rear aperture was only accessible via a spinning bank vault handle and the front doors were locked via a rotating combination lock. Oh, and there was a 45-inch TV mounted to the inside of the rear bank-vault-door to help you while away the hours of being shot at to no effect.
Give me some numbers.
We should probably start off with the size of the thing, really. Because, while it looks... well, American-sized, it’s actually only about four metres long. That’s the length of a Ford Fiesta. And there’s a very good reason for that – the SynUS (yeah, we like it better that way) was apparently Ford’s way of testing the waters for a Fiesta-sized car in the US. Maybe they should have called it the TenUS?
Anywhos, it used Mondeo oily bits – in particular the diesel-powered 2.0-litre Mondeo oily bits. So that meant 130-odd horsepower, 230 foot pounds and the enduring admiration of 8 out of 10 fleet managers.
While we’re talking numbers, it’s probably worth mentioning the roughly zero per cent chance of seeing that dude on a motorbike before he has an impromptu lesson in how real-life physics isn’t as friendly as it looks on Looney Tunes.
Advertisement - Page continues belowDid it actually work?
There were some road-ready features – the Fiesta platform and Mondeo drivetrain have notched up more miles than the Voyager space probe, so there’s no issue getting them to work in anything from a businessman’s work car to a mobile bank vault. That massive 45-inch screen? It was hooked up to a reversing camera, which meant rear visibility only matched by standing behind a nudist on an escalator.
But did it work as a concept? Well, not really. Fiestas aren’t often bought by the oligarchy, and when they buy armoured vehicles, they tend to keep them as low-key as possible. So styling your armoured car to look like a cross between an armoured van and Scrooge McDuck’s coin-diving recreation area is probably not the way forward.
Why should I have cared about it?
At the time, it was a bit of a novelty. And Ford was still open to a bit of novelty back then. So you can forgive the fine people of 2005 for seeing it as the conceptual fancy that it was and continuing on with their lives.
But look at Ford USA now – it’s ditching every single car it makes, bar the Mustang, to focus on pick-ups and SUVs. So that leaves us (or at least the US) with the Mustang, which is pushing 60 years old. Pick-up trucks, which use the same ladder-frame chassis we had when we were pulled around by horses, not horsepower. And SUVs, which are never worth talking about. So we won’t.
What we will talk about is where that leaves Ford. Where is the whimsy? Where is the confidence, the optimism, the enthusiasm? Some might say that whimsy and enthusiasm don’t make money, and they may be right. But making money only benefits the person making it. Making something worthwhile benefits everyone. And that’s what we’ve lost.
Why did it fail?
Plenty of reasons, the most influential of which is that Ford had absolutely no intention of making a production version. But the Ford GT wasn’t meant for production either – just a celebration of the original GT40 and everything Ford had achieved in its 100 years – and it went into production.
Then again, the Ford GT was beyond beautiful and harked back to Henry Ford II’s hell-for-leather campaign to trounce Ferrari after Enzo rejected his buyout offer. The SYNus was built like a bank vault and had less history than a paranoiac’s internet browser. And it looked like it was called the sinus. So, y’know. Pick a reason.
Trending this week
- Car Review
- Electric
- Car Review